Hello Liberals!

By your definition, I am a racist.
If you are not yet, you will be pissed off by the time you read this.
I am evil due to the color of my skin, and you are righteous because of the color of yours.

Yes, I understand that these are assumptions. What is the road map to my conclusions?

  • Go down It’s alright to judge someone by the color of their skin as long as it is white Boulevard
  • Take a left at If it’s white and it’s a man, it’s wrong Drive
  • Stop at Reverse racism for retribution is justified Lane
  • If you pass Stereotypes exist for a reason Avenue, you went too far.

If a black woman tried to enter herself into a beauty pageant and was told she was not allowed to enter for no other reason than she was black, the world would cry “Racists!” This may surprise you, since you are undoubtedly making up your mind about me and judging me, but I would agree with the racist tag. I would also call the offending committee’s actions wrong.

Herein lies the problem. How can the “world” see racism in action so clearly in some instances, and ignore it completely in others? If you take the exact same scenario, but reverse it, nobody sees a problem. A white woman attempts to enter the Black Miss America pageant, and is refused entry along with some peculiar looks from the committee as they say, “Are you kidding us? This is for black women only!” Somehow this is acceptable. As a matter of fact, not only is it not a problem, some people actually see it as payback or retribution for years of other white people being racist towards other black people.

Wait a second, did you catch that? I grouped people together by the color of their skin and nobody noticed! How many of you would have noticed if I quoted an article saying, “At the high school level, for instance, only 31 percent of black males graduate after four years. And of the black male labor market (defined as those 16 to 64), only 55 percent are employed.”? (Jaschik) That, even though it is true, is wrong to say! How dare I refer to these people by the color of their skin? The reason that some people find the reality of race identification shocking is it is true! It isn’t wrong to group people together by their skin color as long as it is used when showing the evils of white people, but don’t dare group people by the color of their skin if it shows any ethnic group in a dark light. (Pun intended)

This ignored racism occurs in too many places to list them all, but here are a few:

Accepted Examples
vs “Racist” Equivilents

Black Student Union on college campuses
White Student Union on college campuses

Black Entertainment Television
White Entertainment Television

Black Miss America
White Miss America

Hispanic only Scholarships
White only Scholarships

Black Pride Parade
White Pride Parade

Black History Month
White History Month

The theory that I hinted at earlier about payback or retribution is absurd! “White Man” killed many Indians…

Side note: I used the term ‘Indians’ on purpose, I am offended by the term “Native Americans”. And since I, the offended, am not allowed to be judged on the basis of my offense, and am apparently guaranteed to live a life free from offense by some secret clause of the Constitution known only to Liberals, ‘Indians’ is the term I will use.

…and therefore they continue to be held “responsible” for their actions. I, as a white man, still pay for the actions of white people in the past. Using this theory, I feel that I am owed certain paybacks even though like the Indians, I am not the one that was killed, nor is the proposed payee the one who actually committed the wrongdoing. To implement my plan, I propose that Colleges and Universities allow my future white child to go to school for free while Muslim children are required to pay more for their attendance. I want my child to be guaranteed acceptance into any university due to her whiteness, even though a Muslim student may have better grades and better SAT and ACT test scores.

This theory of payback is convenient when it isn’t truly followed. If my grandfather was killed by a drunk driver, the grandchild of the driver needs to pay my child’s way through college and needs to give up his job opportunities to allow my child to have the job. The fact that his child may actually be a welder, and my child doesn’t know the difference between metal and wood, doesn’t matter. The only thing that matters is that my grandfather’s offspring be allowed to attain jobs over the drunk drivers offspring. That sounds fair to me!

To be continued….

http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2005/12/05/blackmale Scott Jaschik