Did liberals go through eight other titles until they found one they could sell to America?

• Title I: Screw male athletes plan
• Title II: Unfair advantage for female athletes plan
• Title III: Lets coddle the girls plan
• Title IV: Money for gender, not merit plan
• Title V: Girls need extra help plan
• Title VI: Socialism in sports plan
• Title VII: We ran out of important things to do plan
• Title IIX: Maybe France will like us now plan

After the first eight titles, they apparently saw their chances of implementing this plan dwindling, and they surely ran out of ideas. Someone somewhere in some boardroom must have said, “Let’s just call it Title IX, that way nobody will know what it is about.”

Title IX was instituted in 1972 and its entire design was to prevent Universities from discriminating athletes on the basis of sex…..remember this sentence.

Title IX says that if 52% of the student body is female, then 52% of the athletes need to be female. The major offender in keeping this proportionate number unbalanced is the football program at many universities. Backers of Title IX complain that the school spends too much money on their football programs. According to Nancy Hogshead-Makar, who specializes in Title IX cases where she teaches at the Florida Coastal School of Law, “There are three genders - men, women and football.” Yes, football does get a large amount of the budget…but let’s not forget this, football brings in a large amount of the budget.

If the women want their football, fine! Let them have it! Of course they will have to go through the same steps to birth their super sport as men did. They will have to invent a new game, establish rules and regulations, organize teams, and go from there. After 20 or so years, if their sport is popular with America, they will have started to create their own football. Then, when the sport is played in universities, people will actually want to go see them play and the money will start coming in. Simple as that.

I wish the argument ended there. Instead of promoting sports for female athletes in order to comply with Title IX, universities are cutting males and entire male sports programs to “even” the numbers out. Greg Louganis, the Olympic gold medalist, dove on the University of Miami’s swimming and diving team. That team no longer exists because of Title IX. The UCLA gymnastics team, which boasts a proud history of Olympic level gymnasts, was smashed in the path of Title IX as well. You may not care that only 20 men’s gymnast teams now exist instead of the over a hundred before Title IX’s wrath. Maybe you will care when you see the screenshot of whatever news station is covering the Olympics shows the total number of medals by country. Just as a start, don’t plan on seeing any for men’s swimming, diving, wrestling, or gymnastics….they are becoming extinct.

In order to boost numbers of female athletes, many universities have created female crew. What a wonderful idea! A new sport that we can cram as many women on as we need to get our numbers to comply! As 60 Minutes interviewed the new female members of Arizona State University’s crew team, many of the girls (receiving full ride scholarships mind you) admitted to not only never rowing a boat, but one girl even admitted to not knowing what crew was when she was approached by ASU. Wonderful idea! ASU cut Olympic level gymnasts, and replaced them with a bunch of women on full ride scholarships that don’t even know what their sport is. How does this not piss women off? Don’t you ladies see that you are being used here?

So, many men are being told they can’t play simply because they are men….remember that sentence from before? —“ Title IX was instituted in 1972 and its entire design was to prevent Universities from discriminating athletes on the basis of sex” Sure looks like Title IX is working to me!

I have it…the missing title for Title IX!

• Title IX: Females rowing to equality